Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Date: 2009-09-21 02:56:53
Message-ID: 603c8f070909201956g2a66a829kf088c1d7226aa289@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
>
>
> --On 25. August 2009 22:17:38 -0400 Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I'm just posting in case somebody has thoughts on the UI part of it.
>>
>> Other things that need fixed:
>>
>> - need to figure out locking for roles; this stuff must be synchronized
>>  with role drop
>> - pg_shadow and pg_roles need a join to obtain settings
>> - two regression tests need their expected file updated
>> - catalog version bump
>
> Here's a first shot on this for my current review round. Patch needed to
> re-merged into current CVS HEAD due to some merge conflicts, i've also
> adjusted the regression tests (minor). On a first look, i like the patch
> (especially the code for the utility commands accessing the settings is
> better modularized now, which looks much nicer).

So is this ready to commit, or what?

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marcos Luis Ortiz Valmaseda 2009-09-21 03:10:24 Re: generic copy options
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-09-21 02:54:39 Re: Linux LSB init script