From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Date: | 2009-08-26 18:26:30 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070908261126v175fe396n392973b3cca66bbf@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yup. This is a huge problem and we need to deal with it somehow. At
> the same time, I'm worried that our beta testing process is already
> inadequate. We've found several rather embarrassing bugs in 8.4, for
> instance, things that should have been found in beta IMO. Shortening
> beta or encouraging people to start next-cycle development instead of
> testing doesn't seem like a wise move. You can't just develop all
> the time, you have to test & debug too ...
Sure, but an aimless mandate to do testing for 4 (or 8, or 12) months
doesn't necessarily buy you much, either. I'm good at focused
activity - but there was nothing focused about 8.4 beta that I could
see. Maybe we need some kind of TestFest process.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel Pouré | 2009-08-26 18:31:48 | Re: 8.5 release timetable, again |
Previous Message | decibel | 2009-08-26 18:11:50 | Re: pretty print viewdefs |