From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Another patch |
Date: | 2009-08-04 13:09:41 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070908040609j284bc0abn9aa5a18b816984ad@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Greg Stark<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Jeff Davis<pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 21:15 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jeff Davis<pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> > I'm ready for another patch. The prefix synonym patch is about done, I
>>>> > just made some doc/comment suggestions.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for all of your work so far. Could you take a look at "Merge
>>>> Append"? Tom already reviewed the planner parts of the patch, but I
>>>> think there are other things that could use some feedback.
>>
>> For what it's worth the planner side of things was precisely the area
>> I needed feedback on. I'm not sure I know exactly what to do here but
>> I suppose Tom's done all he could and nobody else is going to be able
>> to help more. I'm happy with moving this to Returned with feedback.
>
> Well, in that case, never mind...
Jeff,
Given Greg's comments here, could you do an additional review of
"Parser's hook based on FuncCall"?
Thanks,
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-08-09 17:31:26 | Re: Another patch |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-08-04 13:06:41 | Re: Another patch |