Re: Mostly Harmless: c++bookends - patch 2 of 4

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kurt Harriman <harriman(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mostly Harmless: c++bookends - patch 2 of 4
Date: 2009-07-16 14:00:03
Message-ID: 603c8f070907160700t71b04839w26cdbb8bbf77f6aa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> So I think either decoration is added to all of these files or none of them.
> And I think the former is not going to go over well.

We do have some things that are conditioned on __cplusplus already,
such as "c.h", "pg_config.h.in", and "postgres_ext.h". So at some
point we at least thought about supporting inclusion of our header
files from C++. But I agree that if we're going to do it at all, we
ought to do it everywhere.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-07-16 14:16:45 Re: [PATCH] plpythonu datatype conversion improvements
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2009-07-16 13:59:22 Re: boolean in C