| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: generic options for explain |
| Date: | 2009-05-25 00:53:26 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070905241753s50d018f0vc95092507929e301@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> You know about SET LOCAL, no? I don't think this argument is very
>>> convincing.
>
>> I completely fail to see how that helps me.
>
> Mainly, what it does is avoid having to know exactly what the old
> setting was.
Ah, OK, I see what you're going for. That's not really what I'm
complaining about with that syntax, though....
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-05-25 01:27:01 | Re: generic options for explain |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-24 23:57:34 | Re: WAL archive, warm backup and read-only slave |