On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Lawrence, Ramon <ramon(dot)lawrence(at)ubc(dot)ca> wrote:
> I would be interested in working with you on any of these changes to
> hash join if you decide to pursue them. I am especially interested in
> looking at the hash aggregation code and potentially improving its
Wow, that would be great!
> We have implemented a multi-way hash join (can join more than 2 tables
> at a time) which may help with cases #3 and #4. Performance results
> look very good, and we are planning on building a patch for this over
> the summer.
I'd be interested in hearing you cope with this on the planner end of things.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-04-03 16:02:51|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 open items list |
|Previous:||From: Bernd Helmle||Date: 2009-04-03 15:39:30|
|Subject: Re: Documentation Update: Document pg_start_backup