Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Date: 2009-03-27 16:27:30
Message-ID: 603c8f070903270927n31f4db4bn4bf416ac89997f08@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Friday 27 March 2009 14:46:32 Greg Stark wrote:
>> Regarding using the hostname of the system... There's no such thing.
>> Interfaces have names, hosts can have multiple interfaces so the can
>> have multiple names...
>
> But there is `hostname` and `hostname --fqdn`, both of which are well-defined
> independent of a connection.

But they aren't guaranteed to return anything useful, and IME often don't.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-27 16:33:23 Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-03-27 16:25:11 Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?