| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ben Ali Rachid <souliman239(at)yahoo(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
| Date: | 2009-03-24 18:21:22 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070903241121l4f8b9e5v522874e342ba7b03@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Personally I'm of the opinion we should eliminate most of these
> duplicative mailing lists like -performance and -interfaces and just
> use -general. I don't see that having multiple lists for user
> questions helps either the users or the answerers due to just this
> type of problem.
-1. I don't read -general; I do read -performance. The S/N ratio is
high enough to make it worth the time it takes; I don't think that
would be true on -general.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Lor | 2009-03-24 18:33:00 | Re: Broken stuff in new dtrace probes |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-03-24 18:11:17 | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-03-25 01:03:15 | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-03-24 18:11:17 | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |