Re: TODO items for window functions

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO items for window functions
Date: 2008-12-30 18:55:38
Message-ID: 603c8f070812301055j343a9f4bwbaf86bee1c577c43@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Apparently that analogy didn't impress anyone but me. AFAICT the
> majority opinion is that we should use the syntax
>
> create [or replace] [window] function ...
>
> but just ignore the distinction between regular functions and window
> functions for all other function-related SQL commands. Barring further
> discussion, I'll make that happen in the next day or two.

It impressed me. I liked making WINDOW a flag that occurs later in
the statement a lot better.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2008-12-30 19:00:59 Re: about truncate
Previous Message David Fetter 2008-12-30 18:52:30 Re: TODO items for window functions