| From: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Postgres Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BufferAccessStrategy for bulk insert |
| Date: | 2008-10-31 02:46:49 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070810301946m264bdb8ap2838cf9f467e1c18@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> You should try profiling the patch. You can count the invocations of the
> buffer access routines to check its all working in the right ratios.
*goes and learns how to do profile PostgreSQL*
OK, that was a good suggestion. It looks like part of my problem here
is that I didn't put the CREATE TABLE and the COPY into the same
transaction. As a result, a lot of time was spent on XLogInsert.
Modified the test case, new profiling results attached.
...Robert
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| gmon.trunk.txt.gz | application/x-gzip | 10.6 KB |
| gmon.patched.txt.gz | application/x-gzip | 10.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2008-10-31 03:05:43 | Re: BufferAccessStrategy for bulk insert |
| Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2008-10-31 01:54:56 | Re: Strange query behavior where clause produces odd behavior on '>' query |