Re: minimal update

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Michael Glaesemann" <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minimal update
Date: 2008-10-22 21:24:30
Message-ID: 603c8f070810221424m71c234a6ld694e2675ee591b2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Can we call the function "minimal_update_trigger", rather than min_...
>
> "Minimal" really fails to convey the point here IMHO. How about
> something like "suppress_no_op_updates_trigger"?

+1. That's a much better name.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-10-22 21:48:10 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-22 21:16:37 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rework subtransaction commit protocol for hot standby.