| From: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The Axe list |
| Date: | 2008-10-11 13:02:15 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070810110602n2fa2c27dp4b6910d922d5a6de@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> If it's a bad way to do it, that's certainly an argument for keeping
>> (or maybe generalizing) intagg.
>
> There was actually a patch this past commitfest to *add* functionality to
> intagg. When I reviewed it I said it would make more sense to generalize it
> and integrate that functionality into the base array operations.
I suppose it's just a question of finding enough round tuits.
I might take a look at it but my grasp of toasting and memory
management may not be good enough yet.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-10-11 13:37:03 | recursive query crash |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-10-11 12:49:57 | Re: The Axe list |