| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
| Date: | 2003-09-12 03:13:54 |
| Message-ID: | 6032.1063336434@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it ****BREAKS**** UnixWare (If y'all=
> =20
> care).
Unfixably? Or just a small oversight?
I'm actually not worried about platforms that are actively being tested.
It's the stuff that hasn't been confirmed recently that is going to be
at risk.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-12 03:14:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-12 03:09:23 | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-12 03:14:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-12 03:09:23 | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |