Re: duplicate connection failure messages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: duplicate connection failure messages
Date: 2010-11-26 23:53:19
Message-ID: 6025.1290815599@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Is "::" correct?

I don't think so ... I get this, even sillier, response:

$ psql -h ::1 -p 5433 regression
psql: could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "::1" (::) and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5433?

Seems like a logic bug in inet_net_ntop_ipv6. Before we waste mental
effort finding it for ourselves, has anyone checked for fixes in the
upstream code lately?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-27 00:02:27 Re: Assertion failure on hot standby
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-26 23:35:32 Re: Assertion failure on hot standby