Re: ICU integration

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Doug Doole <ddoole(at)salesforce(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ICU integration
Date: 2016-09-07 12:53:22
Message-ID: 6008673a-e371-8437-adc0-96fba4a74028@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/6/16 1:40 PM, Doug Doole wrote:
> We carried the ICU version numbers around on our collation and locale
> IDs (such as fr_FR%icu36) . The database would load multiple versions of
> the ICU library so that something created with ICU 3.6 would always be
> processed with ICU 3.6. This avoided the problems of trying to change
> the rules on the user. (We'd always intended to provide tooling to allow
> the user to move an existing object up to a newer version of ICU, but we
> never got around to doing it.) In the code, this meant we were
> explicitly calling the versioned API so that we could keep the calls
> straight.

I understand that in principle, but I don't see operating system
providers shipping a bunch of ICU versions to facilitate that. They
will usually ship one.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-09-07 13:46:32 Re: Install extensions using update scripts (was Re: Remove superuser() checks from pgstattuple)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-09-07 12:50:52 Re: WAL consistency check facility