Re: Read/Write block sizes

From: Ron <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Read/Write block sizes
Date: 2005-08-25 20:26:34
Message-ID: 6.2.3.4.0.20050825162308.05dbf298@pop.earthlink.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

At 03:45 PM 8/25/2005, Josh Berkus wrote:
>Jeff,
>
> > Ask me sometime about my replacement for GNU sort. Â It uses the same
> > sorting algorithm, but it's an order of magnitude faster due to better
> > I/O strategy. Â Someday, in my infinite spare time, I hope to demonstrate
> > that kind of improvement with a patch to pg.
>
>Since we desperately need some improvements in sort performance, I do hope
>you follow up on this.
>
>--
>--Josh

I'll generalize that. IMO we desperately need
any and all improvements in IO performance. Even
more so than we need improvements in sorting or sorting IO performance.

Ron

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2005-08-25 20:49:26 Re: Read/Write block sizes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-25 20:19:50 Re: What *_mem to increase when running CLUSTER