From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ANALYZE locks pg_listener in EXCLUSIVE for long |
Date: | 2004-05-03 04:43:14 |
Message-ID: | 6.1.0.6.0.20040503143426.0495b4f8@203.8.195.10 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 02:33 PM 3/05/2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>Could
>you dig a little deeper and see where the problem really is?
I thought I had 8-(.
The result of a 'select * from pg_locks where not granted' was a bunch of
locks on the pg_listener relation, and no others. Only one process had a
lock on that relation, and it was an ANALYZE command. If there is something
else to look for next time it happens, please let me know.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp.mit.edu:11371 |/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-03 04:54:22 | Re: ANALYZE locks pg_listener in EXCLUSIVE for long time? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-03 04:33:26 | Re: ANALYZE locks pg_listener in EXCLUSIVE for long time? |