| From: | Allen Landsidel <all(at)biosys(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: index creation order? |
| Date: | 2003-10-31 19:01:28 |
| Message-ID: | 6.0.0.22.0.20031031135905.023f9140@pop.hotpop.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
At 13:40 10/31/2003, Neil Conway wrote:
>On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 13:27, Allen Landsidel wrote:
> > I had no idea analyze was playing such a big role in this sense.. I really
> > thought that other than saving space, it wasn't doing much for tables that
> > don't have indexes on the.
>
>ANALYZE doesn't save any space at all -- VACUUM is probably what you're
>thinking of.
Actually, I was thinking VACUUM ANALYZE.. which is what I ran after the
COPY.. sorry for my lack of precision.
I've yet to run straight-up ANALYZE AFAIK.
-Allen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chester Kustarz | 2003-10-31 20:32:30 | Re: index creation order? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-31 18:58:19 | Re: index creation order? |