bugfifx: a minor mistake in brin_inclusion.c comment

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: bugfifx: a minor mistake in brin_inclusion.c comment
Date: 2018-03-23 00:32:55
Message-ID: 5ff514f2-8b1e-6366-b11c-8e2ed442562d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

while looking at brin_inclusion.c, I've noticed that the comment about
INCLUSION_UNMERGEABLE and INCLUSION_CONTAINS_EMPTY uses incorrect values
(1 instead of 2). Attached is a simple fix.

But perhaps it would be better to use the constants in the comment.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
brin-inclusion-doc-fix.patch text/x-patch 765 bytes

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-23 01:02:06 Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-03-23 00:30:14 Re: Using base backup exclusion filters to reduce data transferred with pg_rewind