| From: | walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fixing CREATEROLE |
| Date: | 2022-11-29 07:19:27 |
| Message-ID: | 5f1a023b-c0d2-8b03-e1cc-c1ad8e1014b3@technowledgy.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas:
> And the result is that I've got like five people, some of whom
> particulated in those discussions, showing up to say "hey, we don't
> need the ability to set defaults." Well, if that's the case, then why
> did we have hundreds and hundreds of emails within the last 12 months
> arguing about which way it should work?
For me: "Needed" as in "required". I don't think we *require* defaults
to make this useful, just as David said as well. Personally, I don't
need defaults either, at least I didn't have a use-case for it, yet. I'm
not objecting to introduce defaults, but I do object to *how* they were
introduced in your patch set, so far. It just wasn't consistent with the
other stuff that already exists.
Best,
Wolfgang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2022-11-29 07:29:48 | Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-11-29 07:08:27 | Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump |