| From: | "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <a(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash? |
| Date: | 2025-02-13 07:48:15 |
| Message-ID: | 5ef9fb1c-2e5a-489e-85f5-ba7ac6159577@postgrespro.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi!
On 13.02.2025 09:03, John Naylor wrote:
>
> Three weeks ago, you said "Agreed that reverting seems as a preferable
> way, and here's why." I assumed that meant you tested it, so my
> mistake. I'll take a look.
>
Sorry! I was wrong not to express my thoughts clearly here.
I meant revert in a common sense. Maybe before the optimization started
at all, because there was the fastest result on short lines.
Although it is unknown how it will be in reality and it could be
worse than optimization with some fixes.
With the best regards,
--
Anton A. Melnikov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladlen Popolitov | 2025-02-13 09:01:05 | PoC. The saving of the compiled jit-code in the plan cache |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-02-13 07:48:04 | Re: Proposal - Allow extensions to set a Plan Identifier |