From: | Chris Travers <chris(at)metatrontech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: dividing money by money |
Date: | 2010-03-30 19:07:54 |
Message-ID: | 5ed37b141003301207w722332c3kecba1fe278047c8f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Forgot to send to the list....
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
>> Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
>>> But then any operator between two money values would
>>> only work if both values have the same currency.
>
> That sounds like a sane limitation.
>
>> and, are there still any currenccies like old style UK where
>> the subunits aren't 100ths? schillings or whatever
>
> I'm not sure if you're arguing for or against the database type
> knowing how to divide those to get a percentage, versus putting the
> onus on the application programmer. Where does it make the most
> sense to you to put such logic?
With due respect, this sort of thing is rather difficult to get right
all at once. I would suggest at some point having a modified MONEY or
maybe to avoid conflicts let's call it a CURRENCY datatype on
Pg-foundry where we can experiment and get these details right. I am
thinking of doing a rough draft in SQL and PLPGSQL so that someone can
convert to C once everything works properly :-).
If folks are interested, I might make a simple approximation of this
that would require 8.4 or higher. It might come in handy for
LedgerSMB too.....
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-03-30 19:49:10 | Re: dividing money by money |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-30 17:47:39 | Re: BUG #5395: UPDATE on shutdown overwrites table |