From: | Chris Travers <chris(at)metatrontech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bug in triggers |
Date: | 2010-03-10 16:30:57 |
Message-ID: | 5ed37b141003100830s16246f91rfee3fe7f167ac21b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> We may need to document it, but not like that; it's (a) incorrect and
>> (b) unhelpful to the reader, who is left without any clear idea of what
>> to avoid. I think that the real issue here doesn't have anything to do
>> with NEW/OLD as such, but is related to the representational difference
>> between record and row variables.
>
> I agree. That's precisely what I'm confused about.
>
- Show quoted text -
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> We may need to document it, but not like that; it's (a) incorrect and
>> (b) unhelpful to the reader, who is left without any clear idea of what
>> to avoid. I think that the real issue here doesn't have anything to do
>> with NEW/OLD as such, but is related to the representational difference
>> between record and row variables.
>
> I agree. That's precisely what I'm confused about.
Additionally, plpgsql uses "record" seemingly to refer to row
variables, so pointing folks to this conversation may not necessarily
clear up confusion....
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-03-10 20:36:32 | Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-03-10 16:20:08 | Re: Bug in triggers |