Re: pgrowlocks relkind check

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgrowlocks relkind check
Date: 2017-06-22 04:04:58
Message-ID: 5e80b776-28dc-9458-b5f3-8ccc47799134@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/06/22 12:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/14/17 01:34, Amit Langote wrote:
>> How about the attached patch that teaches pgrowlocks() to error out unless
>> a meaningful result can be returned? With the patch, it will issue a "%s
>> is not a table" message if it is not a RELKIND_RELATION, except a
>> different message will be issued for partitioned tables (for they are
>> tables).
>
> committed

Thanks.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-06-22 04:12:48 Re: Autovacuum launcher occurs error when cancelled by SIGINT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-06-22 03:40:47 Re: outfuncs.c utility statement support