Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Date: 2019-02-22 17:11:41
Message-ID: 5e7dc8a0-7978-5892-a533-d72495d5039d@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/22/19 6:32 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:13 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On 2/16/19 5:57 AM, Andres Freund wrote:

>>>> I don't agree with a general 5 year deprecation window either. But it
>>>> seems pretty clear that there's no majority for removing exclusive
>>>> backups in v12. I think it'd be good to make the warning about its
>>>> impending death more explicit, but otherwise mark this CF entry either
>>>> as rejected or returned with feedback.
>>>
>>> I think there is support for the patch in PG13 so I was planning to move
>>> it out of the March CF to the first PG13 CF as soon as the app will
>>> allow it, i.e., once there is only a single open CF.
>>
>> Agreed, and I think we should also update the documentation for 12 with the
>> suggested more explicit mention of the deprecation.
>
> +1.

I'm working on this for the March CF. Ideally we would back-patch it to
9.6.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2019-02-22 17:22:06 Re: Referential Integrity Checks with Statement-level Triggers
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2019-02-22 16:59:32 Re: speeding up planning with partitions