Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:47:13 +0100, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 19:49, Radosław Smogura <mail(at)smogura(dot)eu> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Maybe you are interested about this what I done with JDBC
>
> <snip>
>
>
>> Driver is here
>> http://www.rsmogura.net/pgsql/pgjdbc_exp_20101130_C.tar.gz is
>> currently JDK 6 compatible (will be not), compressed patch takes about
>> 136kb
>> gziped.
>
> Is there any particular reason why this work can't be maintained as a
> branch to the main driver? My understanding is your work is based off
> that one? Being able to work like that would make things a lot easier
> to review.
Yes, it's based on this, with CVS subfolders in sources. I don't see any
problems to maintain this as branch. Ah only one need to read something
about CVS & branching.

> That said, such a process would also be a lot easier if the JDBC
> driver wasn't in cvs ;)
Yes, SVN is much more nicer.
>
> --
>  Magnus Hagander
>  Me: http://www.hagander.net/
>  Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

--
----------
Radosław Smogura
http://www.softperience.eu