| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE |
| Date: | 2021-08-12 17:21:01 |
| Message-ID: | 5d6fdae7dbfd9be4548cad1cd7cccd97d6eaee27.camel@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> No, you're right, although I think it's implied. Maybe we need a
> statement along these lines:
>
>
> Committers are responsible for the resolution of open items that
> relate
> to commits they have made. Action needs to be taken in a timely
> fashion,
> and if there is any substantial delay in dealing with an item the
> committer should provide a date by which they expect action to be
> completed. The RMT will follow up where these requirements are not
> being
> complied with.
I think that would be helpful, yes.
> If they are fine by you then I accept that. After all, the reason we
> want you to deal with this is not only that you made the original
> commit
> but because you're the expert in this area.
I will commit the patch(es). Thanks.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2021-08-12 17:54:25 | Re: call popcount32/64 directly on non-x86 platforms |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2021-08-12 16:54:02 | Re: badly calculated width of emoji in psql |