Re: Commitfest 2018-11

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest 2018-11
Date: 2018-12-03 15:49:39
Message-ID: 5d6f3f25-2b3e-23b7-1cd3-622d33034cdd@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/1/18 1:46 PM, Lætitia Avrot wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, I've been annoyed by that too (not that I've not been guilty of
> it myself).  We should probably tell people not to add themselves as
> reviewers unless they're actively planning to review soon, because it
> discourages other people from reviewing the same item.  Maybe also,
> when a patch gets moved to the next CF, we should drop all reviewers
> (ie make them sign up afresh if they're still interested).
>
>
> +1 on that one. It's not because you had time on the previous commit
> fest that you'll have time for the next.

+1. I've been in this situation myself.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2018-12-03 15:49:42 Re: [proposal] Add an option for returning SQLSTATE in psql error message
Previous Message didier 2018-12-03 15:40:54 Re: [proposal] Add an option for returning SQLSTATE in psql error message