Re: Improve monitoring of shared memory allocations

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve monitoring of shared memory allocations
Date: 2026-04-07 08:19:03
Message-ID: 5d2a7fd6-b946-445f-851d-79a8fca0faa6@iki.fi
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/02/2026 14:17, Rahila Syed wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Was this forgotten, superseded, abandoned, or should it still be under
> consideration?
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5620/ <https://
> commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5620/>
>
>
> This hasn't been forgotten; I just haven't had a chance to address the
> comments
> about improving test coverage yet. I think it is still possible to make
> this work for
> shared hash tables. I will try to rebase and add some tests before the
> next commitfest.

This was superseded by commit 9fe9ecd516, I'll close this in the
commitfest app. Thanks!

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2026-04-07 08:22:48 Re: Clean up remove_rel_from_query() after self-join elimination commit
Previous Message Lukas Fittl 2026-04-07 08:13:17 Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?