Re: [PATCH] Let's get rid of the freelist and the buffer_strategy_lock

From: "Greg Burd" <greg(at)burd(dot)me>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "Thomas Munro" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tomas Vondra" <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let's get rid of the freelist and the buffer_strategy_lock
Date: 2025-09-04 17:24:00
Message-ID: 5d03a04e-73fd-4c5f-8dfd-364745767c0e@app.fastmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Thu, Sep 4, 2025, at 12:59 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-08-27 15:42:48 -0400, Greg Burd wrote:
>> Regardless, I feel the first two patches on this set address the
>> intention of this thread.
>
> I'm planning to commit the first two patches after making a pass through
> them. I have some work that I'm cleaning up to post that'd conflict and Tomas'
> NUMA patches are affected too.

Fantastic, and thank you. If you have any concerns I'm here to work through them with you. I'll carry over the idea from the 3rd patch into a new thread.

> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund

best,

-greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-09-04 17:30:27 Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2025-09-04 17:07:15 Re: PgStat_HashKey padding issue when passed by reference