| From: | Enno Wein <ennowein(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15115: temporary AND unlogged tables for parallel db import |
| Date: | 2018-03-16 14:26:20 |
| Message-ID: | 5d01c4db-6ca0-c780-870d-07a0c08added@yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Yes, we found out by trial and error that temporary and unlogged are
mutually exclusive while the documentation does not point that out
explicitly.
This is an enhancement request to enable having tables which are both
temporary and unlogged.
On 3/16/18 07:03, Andrew Gierth wrote:
>>>>>> "PG" == PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>
> PG> For fresh (large-) database import, we would like to be able to use
> PG> temporary tables which are also unlogged,
>
> All temporary tables are unlogged.
>
> Whatever you're looking at that leads you to conclude otherwise, you are
> misinterpreting. Also, your message is not about a bug, so please take
> the issue to an appropriate forum (e.g. the -general or -performance
> mailing list or the IRC channel, #postgresql on freenode.net)
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-03-16 14:31:40 | Re: BUG #15115: temporary AND unlogged tables for parallel db import |
| Previous Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2018-03-16 14:18:06 | Re: BUG #15108: Initialization problem postgresql-10-setup initdb |