Re: Reject access to unlogged tables in contrib modules

From: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Reject access to unlogged tables in contrib modules
Date: 2026-10-26 07:39:00
Message-ID: 5ce3758d-3be4-4661-a1c4-0cffe59d0e10@uni-muenster.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26/10/2026 05:44, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Okay, I'm sold over this set of suggestions on HEAD to improve the
> user experience. I doubt that this is worth worrying about on stable
> branches due to the lack of reports..

+1
I also don't think it is worth the trouble. Besides the fact that it's
mostly a cosmetic improvement, it's not like anybody has been
complaining too loud about it in the past years :)

Thanks!
Best, Jim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Takeshi Ideriha 2026-10-26 07:50:57 Re: [PATCH] pgcrypto: Fix sha-crypt rounds= values that do not fit in int (BUG #19743)
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-10-26 07:22:20 Re: tablecmds: Deadlock caused by Attach Partition