Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(dot)taveira(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Pirotte <dpirotte(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Subject: Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?
Date: 2021-03-09 14:28:45
Message-ID: 5ca8b97d-a5e7-c005-0ad3-579feef89868@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi David,

On 11/24/20 10:28 PM, Euler Taveira wrote:
>
> I also reviewed your patch. This feature would be really useful for
> replication
> scenarios. Supporting this feature means that you don't need to use a
> table to
> pass messages from one node to another one. Here are a few comments/ideas.

Do you know when you'll have a chance to look at Euler's suggestions?
Also, have Andres' suggestions/concerns upthread been addressed?

Marked Waiting on Author.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-03-09 14:47:28 Re: default result formats setting
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2021-03-09 14:27:11 Re: Nicer error when connecting to standby with hot_standby=off