Re: [HACKERS] Consistently catch errors from Python _New() functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Consistently catch errors from Python _New() functions
Date: 2017-11-18 18:40:46
Message-ID: 5ca74b8f-2c21-893b-d3e5-c819cb0c6f4d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/18/17 12:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 11/17/17 12:16, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm confused by the places that change PLy_elog calls to pass NULL:
>>>
>>> - PLy_elog(ERROR, "could not create globals");
>>> + PLy_elog(ERROR, NULL);
>>>
>>> How is that an improvement? Otherwise it looks reasonable.
>
>> If we pass NULL, then the current Python exception becomes the primary
>> error, so you'd end up with an "out of memory" error of some kind with a
>> stack trace, which seems useful.
>
> Oh, I see. Objection withdrawn.

Committed, thanks.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2017-11-18 19:57:13 spgist rangetypes compiler warning (gcc 7.2.0)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-18 18:32:30 Re: [HACKERS] Add Roman numeral conversion to to_number