Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors

From: Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
Date: 2017-07-14 15:01:56
Message-ID: 5c9f781b61d2292fcbe16ab4ff51499a@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Well, the short version may be to only do a full transaction retry and
> to document that for now savepoints are not handled, and to let that
> for future work if need arises.

I agree with you.

> For progress the output must be short and readable, and probably we do
> not care about whether retries came from this or that, so I would let
> that out.
>
> For log and aggregated log possibly that would make more sense, but it
> must stay easy to parse.

Ok!

--
Marina Polyakova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrien Nayrat 2017-07-14 15:20:32 Re: PG 10 release notes
Previous Message Marina Polyakova 2017-07-14 14:54:37 Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors