| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |
| Date: | 2021-10-19 22:18:55 |
| Message-ID: | 5c14df3f1b39f1931d2b4602d3adab9550523f80.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2021-10-19 at 13:17 -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
> Wouldn't it be much cleaner to have superuser bypass the trigger?
Maybe it could be a user property like "BYPASS_EVENT_TRIGGERS", and
only superusers could adjust it (like the SUPERUSER and REPLICATION
properties).
I suppose it would default to BYPASS_EVENT_TRIGGERS for superusers and
not for non-superusers. A little awkward to have different defaults,
but it seems sensible in this case.
Would this bypass all event triggers, or only the event triggers of
another user?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2021-10-19 22:25:35 | Re: ALTER INDEX .. RENAME allows to rename tables/views as well |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-10-19 22:12:51 | Re: ALTER INDEX .. RENAME allows to rename tables/views as well |