Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date: 2018-10-04 09:22:32
Message-ID: 5bad579d-7a99-74de-2311-b4f049da8b40@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/03/2018 05:57 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> Is there any meaningful distinction between "inlining," by which I
> mean converting to a subquery, and predicate pushdown, which
> would happen at least for a first cut, at the rewrite stage?

Sorry, but I do not think I understand your question. The ability to
push down predicates is just one of the potential benefits from inlining.

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phil Florent 2018-10-04 09:32:37 RE: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics for wait event
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-10-04 09:19:27 Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations