Re: 10beta1/m68k: static assertion failed: "MAXALIGN too small to fit int32"

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: 10beta1/m68k: static assertion failed: "MAXALIGN too small to fit int32"
Date: 2017-05-18 19:23:02
Message-ID: 5b9085c2-2c18-e5e3-c340-c07d11a9ccd3@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/18/2017 12:31 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Heikki Linnakangas 2017-05-18 <e0bfad8e-ec5d-28ee-ebbc-4670d465b3cf(at)iki(dot)fi>
>> I'll commit that, barring objections. If you can verify that it fixes the
>> problem before that, that'd be great, otherwise I guess we'll find out some
>> time after the commit.
>
> Please go ahead, I don't think I have online access to a m68k machine.
> (It got demoted to an unofficial port some time ago and the old Debian
> porter machines got taken down).

Ok, pushed, let's see if the port machine likes it.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2017-05-18 19:29:24 Re: 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-18 19:21:44 different column orders in regression test database