| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Requiring LLVM 14+ in PostgreSQL 18 |
| Date: | 2024-05-15 05:20:09 |
| Message-ID: | 5a256041-2520-4082-8483-7f8c1e79fb88@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15.05.24 06:21, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> And as I'm looking up how this was previously handled, I notice that
>> this list of clang-NN versions was last updated equally sneakily as part
>> of your patch to trim off LLVM <10 (820b5af73dc). I wonder if the
>> original intention of that configure code was that maintaining the
>> versioned list above clang-7/llvm-config-7 was not needed, because the
>> unversioning programs could be used, or maybe because pkg-config could
>> be used. It would be nice if we could get rid of having to update that.
> I probably misunderstood why we were doing that, perhaps something to
> do with the way some distro (Debian?) was doing things with older
> versions, and yeah I see that we went a long time after 7 without
> touching it and nobody cared. Yeah, it would be nice to get rid of
> it. Here's a patch. Meson didn't have that.
Yes, let's get that v3-0001 patch into PG17.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-05-15 05:23:19 | Re: An improved README experience for PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2024-05-15 05:12:50 | Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR |