Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pabloa98 <pabloa98(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)
Date: 2020-03-21 18:55:33
Message-ID: 5ECC9E60-C4BF-47F2-AB6D-3782B05B438C@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Mar 21, 2020, at 12:18 PM, pabloa98 <pabloa98(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 
>
>> Why? "Print" and "screen" forms have all sorts of practical restrictions
>> like this.
>>
> Legacy I guess. These are all digital stuff. But the final result is an identifier that people can read and realize what they are talking about.
>

I think the “why” was directed at my comment.
I’m suspicious of the practicality.

To me the description of the ID smacks of database-in-the-name folly. I recognize that OP is likely unable to take another path. I’ll not push this any further.

> Pablo

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter J. Holzer 2020-03-21 19:07:58 Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)
Previous Message pabloa98 2020-03-21 18:18:15 Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million)