Re: pg_regress: Treat child process failure as test failure

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress: Treat child process failure as test failure
Date: 2023-02-22 20:42:21
Message-ID: 5DAD46C7-61AC-474D-AE33-1146D419F880@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 22 Feb 2023, at 21:33, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2023-02-22 15:10:11 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

>> Rebased patch to handle breakage of v2 due to bd8d453e9b.
>
> I think we probably should just apply this? The current behaviour doesn't seem
> right, and I don't see a downside of the new behaviour?

Agreed, I can't think of a regression test where we wouldn't want this. My
only concern was if any of the ECPG tests were doing something odd that would
break from this but I can't see anything.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-22 20:50:41 Re: Wrong query results caused by loss of join quals
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-22 20:40:22 Re: Improving inferred query column names