Re: doc: vacuum full, fillfactor, and "extra space"

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: doc: vacuum full, fillfactor, and "extra space"
Date: 2020-07-05 11:35:33
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 28 Mar 2020, at 11:23, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:10 PM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 2020-01-20 06:30, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> About your patch, I don't think this is clearer. The fillfactor stuff
>> is valid to be mentioned, but the way it's being proposed makes it sound
>> like the main purpose of VACUUM FULL is to bloat the table to make
>> fillfactor room. The "no extra space" wording made sense to me, with
>> the fillfactor business perhaps worth being put into a parenthetical note.
> Justin, would you like to address this comment of Peter E.?

This patch has been Waiting on Author since April, will you have time to
address the questions during this commitfest, or should it be moved to Returned
with Feedback?

cheers ./daniel

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-05 11:38:33 Re: psql - improve test coverage from 41% to 88%
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-07-05 11:30:29 Re: proposal - function string_to_table