Re: bug in update tuple routing with foreign partitions

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug in update tuple routing with foreign partitions
Date: 2019-04-19 05:40:20
Message-ID: 5CB95F44.1040807@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2019/04/19 13:17), Amit Langote wrote:
> OTOH, we don't mention at all in postgres-fdw.sgml
> that postgres_fdw supports tuple routing. Maybe we should and list this
> limitation or would it be too much burden to maintain?

I think it's better to add this limitation to postgres-fdw.sgml. Will
do. Thanks for pointing that out!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-04-19 05:51:29 Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-04-19 05:39:26 Re: bug in update tuple routing with foreign partitions