| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Back-branch bugs with fully-prunable UPDATEs |
| Date: | 2019-04-08 03:02:15 |
| Message-ID: | 5CAAB9B7.3060800@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2019/04/07 16:54), Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:28 AM Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This seems to be related to what Amit Langote complained of in
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/21e7eaa4-0d4d-20c2-a1f7-c7e96f4ce440@lab.ntt.co.jp
>> but since there's no foreign tables involved at all, either it's
>> a different bug or he misdiagnosed what he was seeing.
>
> I think that one is a different bug, but maybe I haven't looked closely enough.
I started working on that from last Friday (though I didn't work on the
weekend). I agree on Amit's reasoning stated in that post, and I think
that that's my fault. Sorry for the delay.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-04-08 03:21:29 | Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VS query mean time |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2019-04-08 02:58:43 | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction |