| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: The two "XML Fixes" patches still in need of review |
| Date: | 2019-03-23 23:46:23 |
| Message-ID: | 5C96C54F.5090901@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/23/19 18:20, Chapman Flack wrote:
>> Perhaps it'd make sense under the XML section in datatype.sgml,
>> but I think I might lean to making it a new section in Appendix D
>> (SQL Conformance).
>
> Sounds like the option (4) I proposed back in [1]. I suppose it won't
> be much trouble to move.
The current structure of that appendix is: a few introductory paragraphs
(not wrapped in any <sect... ...>), followed by two <sect1>s that are
both autogenerated (the supported and unsupported features tables).
The <sect1>s become independent pages, in the HTML version.
- Move the XML limits/conformance section to a new <sect1> there?
- Before the autogenerated tables, or after them?
The un-<sect>ed intro paragraphs are preceded (in HTML) by a table
of contents, so the new section should show up there.
- Also add a mention (say, in the next-to-last intro paragraph) that
there are notes on the SQL/XML conformance that have their own
section (and link to it)? Or just let the generated ToC link be enough?
Regards,
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2019-03-24 00:17:18 | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-03-23 23:41:25 | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists |