Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Derek Hans <derek(dot)hans(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11
Date: 2019-03-07 12:35:03
Message-ID: 5C810FF7.8010802@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

(2019/03/06 15:34), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2019/03/06 15:10, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> --- a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
>> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
>> @@ -3376,6 +3376,13 @@ ALTER TABLE measurement ATTACH PARTITION
>> measurement_y2008m02
>> </para>
>> </listitem>
>>
>> +<listitem>
>> +<para>
>> +<command>UPDATE</command> row movement is not supported in the cases
>> + where the old row is contained in a foreign table partition.
>> +</para>
>> +</listitem>
>>
>> ISTM that it's also a limitation that rows can be moved from a local
>> partition to a foreign partition *if the FDW support tuple routing*, so I
>> would vote for mentioning that as well here.
>
> Thanks for checking.
>
> I have updated the patch to include a line about this in the same
> paragraph, because maybe we don't need to make a new<listitem> for it.

Thanks for the patch!

The patch looks good to me, but one thing I'm wondering is: as suggested
by David, it would be better to rephrase this mention in the UPDATE
reference page, in a single commit:

"Currently, rows cannot be moved from a partition that is a foreign
table to some other partition, but they can be moved into a foreign
table if the foreign data wrapper supports it."

I don't think it needs to be completely rephrased; it's enough for me to
rewrite it to something like this:

"Currently, rows cannot be moved from a foreign-table partition to some
other partition, but they can be moved into a foreign-table partition if
the foreign data wrapper supports tuple routing."

And to make maintenance work easy, I think it might be better to just
put this on the limitations section of 5.10. Table Partitioning. What
do you think about that?

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Perumal Raj 2019-03-07 13:39:49 Resolved: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2019-03-07 10:32:39 Re: Question about pg_upgrade from 9.2 to X.X

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-03-07 12:46:54 Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
Previous Message Alexey Kondratov 2019-03-07 12:27:25 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line