Re: Oddity with parallel safety test for scan/join target in grouping_planner

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oddity with parallel safety test for scan/join target in grouping_planner
Date: 2019-03-01 10:26:01
Message-ID: 5C7908B9.5070407@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2019/02/28 0:52), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:26 AM Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> The parallel safety of the final scan/join target is determined from the
>> grouping target, not that target, which [ is wrong ]

> Your patch looks right to me.

I think it would be better for you to take this one. Could you?

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2019-03-01 10:41:08 Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-03-01 10:24:47 Re: Unneeded parallel safety tests in grouping_planner