Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2
Date: 2019-02-20 12:30:20
Message-ID: 5C6D485C.9010201@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2019/02/18 12:40), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2019/02/16 14:45), Andres Freund wrote:
>> - postgres_fdw: Perform UPPERREL_ORDERED and UPPERREL_FINAL steps
>> remotely
>>
>> WOA: This is a nontrivial change, and the design and review only
>> started in late December. It's probably not realistic to target v12.
>>
>> Andres: punt to v13
>
> I also think this needs more reviews, but I don't think it's unrealistic
> to target v12, because 1) the patch is actually not that large (at least
> in the latest version, most of the changes are in regression tests), and
> 2) IMO the patch is rather straightforward.

There seems to be no objections, so I marked this as targeting v12.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikita Glukhov 2019-02-20 12:44:13 Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-02-20 12:25:51 Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw