Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw
Date: 2019-02-18 07:33:39
Message-ID: 5C6A5FD3.8080102@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2019/02/15 21:46), Antonin Houska wrote:
> ok, I understand now. I assume that the patch
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5C66A056.60007%40lab.ntt.co.jp
>
> obsoletes the code snippet we discussed above.

Sorry, I don't understand this. Could you elaborate on that?

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-02-18 07:57:07 Re: Copy function for logical replication slots
Previous Message Noah Misch 2019-02-18 07:31:03 SimpleLruTruncate() mutual exclusion