Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw
Date: 2019-02-18 07:20:57
Message-ID: 5C6A5CD9.70402@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2019/02/15 21:19), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> So, here is an updated patch. If there are no objections from you or
> anyone else, I'll commit the patch as a preliminary one for what's
> proposed in this thread.

Pushed, after fiddling with the commit message a bit.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2019-02-18 07:31:03 SimpleLruTruncate() mutual exclusion
Previous Message Matsumura, Ryo 2019-02-18 06:53:39 RE: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG